We need to move on - perhaps by looking back to older forms of social organization. And no coherent political alternative to current political conditions can be formulated within the framework of the national state. Hollowed out by the disintegrative, commodifying forces of capitalism just like the family, the village, and any other civilizing institution (the Church may be a partial exception, but looking from the most secularized country in Europe, a very partial one). The national state is dead - it just doesn't know it yet. At the same time, I believe that the modern national state is no longer a serviceable vehicle for human civilization - if it ever really was. I'm also far from juvenile slogans about "No God, No Master!" There is a God, and there will be masters, too - some perhaps even worthy of service. It's just that the Neo-Nazistic roots, including blood-and-soil mysticism and antisemitism, are sometimes still showing.
Then there's the national-anarchists, who are right in both rejecting capitalism and recognizing that people are unlikely to voluntarily enter an egalitarian, communist brotherhood of man.
I remain too much of an ex-Marxist not to acknowledge that even if individuals may transcend society, they are at the same time constituted by society, social traditions, norms and ideologies. Because of the uncritical attitude towards capitalist rapacity, and the notion of the individual and its liberties as the atomic cornerstone of society. I don't feel at home with most right-wing individualist versions of anarchism either. And I'm not sure anymore whether democracy is the superior system it is so often thought to be. I don't feel much at home with left-wing anarchism because it remains focused on direct democracy, egalitarianism, etc. I've politically described myself as a 'conservative anarchist', which does not make much sense, but makes more sense than just about anything else.